Item type | Current library | Home library | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
American University in Dubai | American University in Dubai | Main Collection | P 96 .E25 H47 2002 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Copy Type:01 - Books | Available | 652677 |
No cover image available | ||||||||
P96.E25 D69 2013 Understanding media economics / | P 96 .E25 E53 2013 Blockbusters. | P 96 .E25 H356 2015 Handbook on the economics of the media / | P 96 .E25 H47 2002 Manufacturing consent : the political economy of the mass media / | P96.E25 S24 2008 Arabic الصحافة الاقتصادية : 2007 / الواقع وافاق المستقبل،أوراق العمل ومناقشات مؤتمر البيان السنوي الثالث | P 96 .E25 T86 2004 Media monoliths : how great media brands thrive and survive / | P 96 .E25 W524 2004 Who owns the media? : global trends and local resistances / |
Updated ed. of: Manufacturing consent. 1st ed. c1988.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
A Propaganda Model -- Worthy and Unworthy Victims -- Legitimizing versus Meaningless Third World Elections: El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua -- The KGB--Bulgarian Plot to Kill the Pope: Free-Market Disinformation as "News" -- The Indochina Wars (I): Vietnam -- The Indochina Wars (II): Laos and Cambodia -- The U.S. Official Observers in Guatemala, July 1-2, 1984 -- Tagliabue's Finale on the Bulgarian Connection: A Case Study in Bias -- Braestrup's Big Story: Some "Freedom House Exclusives".
In this pathbreaking work, now with a new introduction, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.
Based on a series of case studies -- including the media's dichotomous treatment of "worthy" versus "unworthy" victims, "legitimizing" and "meaningless" Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina -- Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media's behavior and performance. Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media's handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media's treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.
There are no comments on this title.