Item type | Current library | Home library | Shelving location | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
American University in Dubai | American University in Dubai | Main Collection | JC 480 .L45 2010 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 5034045 |
JC 423 .Z35 2003 The future of freedom : illiberal democracy at home and abroad / | JC 474 .L364213 1986 The political forms of modern society : bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism / | JC 480 .K35 2003 Open networks, closed regimes : the impact of the Internet on authoritarian rule / | JC 480 .L45 2010 Competitive authoritarianism : hybrid regimes after the Cold War / | JC 489 .T46 2010 Determinants of democratization : explaining regime change in the world, 1972-2006 / | JC 491 .B79 2017 Cuba's revolutionary world / | JC 491 .C28913 1987 The imaginary institution of society / |
Includes bibliographical references (p. 381-491) and index.
Introduction and theory. Introduction ; Explaining competitive authoritarian regime trajectories: international linkage and the organizational power of incumbents -- High linkage and democratization: Eastern Europe and the Americas. Linkage, leverage, and democratization in Eastern Europe ; Linkage, leverage, and democratization in the Americas -- The dynamics of competitive authoritarianism in low-linkage regions: the former Soviet Union, Africa, and Asia. The evolution of post-Soviet competitive authoritarianism ; Africa: transitions without democratization ; Diverging outcomes in Asia ; Conclusion.
"Competitive authoritarian regimes - in which autocrats submit to meaningful multiparty elections but engage in serious democratic abuse - proliferated in the post-Cold War era. Based on a detailed study of 35 cases in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and post-communist Eurasia, this book explores the fate of competitive authoritarian regimes between 1990 and 2008. It finds that where social, economic, and technocratic ties to the West were extensive, as in Eastern Europe and the Americas, the external cost of abuse led incumbents to cede power rather than crack down, which led to democratization. Where ties to the West were limited, external democratizing pressure was weaker and countries rarely democratized. In these cases, regime outcomes hinged on the character of state and ruling party organizations. Where incumbents possessed developed and cohesive coercive party structures, they could thwart opposition challenges, and competitive authoritarian regimes survived; where incumbents lacked such organizational tools, regimes were unstable but rarely democratized"-- Provided by publisher.
There are no comments on this title.