Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
American University in Dubai | American University in Dubai | Non-fiction | Main Collection | DS 448 .A4343 2014 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 5169015 |
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | |||||
DS 442.5 .S475 1999 Defending India / | DS 445 .M8 1967 The Indian image of nineteenth-century Europe | DS 445 .P23 1963 Studies in Indian history / | DS 448 .A4343 2014 How India became territorial : foreign policy, diaspora, geopolitics / | DS 448 .G3472 1985b Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi : statements on foreign policy September - December 1985 / | DS 448 .G3472 1986 Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi : statements on foreign policy May - August 1986 / | DS 449 .K84 2017 India's soft power : a new foreign policy strategy / |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 191-205) and index.
Territory and foreign policy -- A brief international history of the nation-state -- Diaspora as foreign policy -- Geopolitics as foreign policy.
Why do countries go to war over disputed lands? Why do they fight even when the territories in question are economically and strategically worthless? Drawing on critical approaches to international relations, political geography, international law, and social history, and based on a close examination of the Indian experience during the 20th century, Itty Abraham addresses these important questions and offers a new conceptualization of foreign policy as a state territorializing practice. Identifying the contested process of decolonization as the root of contemporary Asian inter-state territorial conflicts, he explores the political implications of establishing a fixed territorial homeland as a necessary starting point for both international recognition and national identity--concluding that disputed lands are important because of their intimate identification with the legitimacy of the postcolonial nation-state, rather than because of their potential for economic gains or their place in historic grievances. By treating Indian diaspora policy and geopolitical practice as exemplars of foreign policy behavior, Abraham demonstrates how their intersection offers an entirely new way of understanding India's vexed relations with Pakistan and China. This approach offers a new and productive way of thinking about foreign policy and inter-state conflicts over territory in Asia--one that is non-U.S. and non-European focused--that has a number of implications for regional security and for foreign policy practices in the contemporary postcolonial world.
There are no comments on this title.